Germany is a country with a particular way of doing things when it comes to the relation between managers and the work force along the organizational structure. On the one hand, the German model is characterized by a common usage of authority as a mean of managing employees, buy on the other hand the work force seems to be well represented in front of the law and even it gets involved very often on the management of the corporations. The power of unions is such important that in many cases they have almost the same power the senior decision makers have, since unions in Germany work jointly at a national level. All these elements make up the concept of co-determination. By means of co-determination law a representative of the workers should be made member for the board of directors in order to represent workers and make decisions in favor of the organization.
Co-determination is vital in terms of the rights and the possibilities that workers have compared to those working in other countries where unions work separately and where conflicts take place not only in an scenario in which they negotiate with managers but also within the union itself. As a result, the search for satisfying personal interest is even more and more popular and that division of unions makes their rights less recognized. Under co-determination model, workers feel they have a main role beyond that one limited just to accomplish basic functions, namely, they can make decisions and feel they can lead the future of the organization.
Migrant workers are those individuals who move from one country to another one in a voluntary way with no intervention coming from external agents. This concept is different to that one of immigrants (who look for permanent residence or stay abroad), migrants own a temporary residence and they’re free to move whenever they consider the need. Obviously, this doesn’t mean there are no pressures motivating that decision, social and economic causes in the home country can be associated to that result, but the final decision is made personally and independently.
Based on the required reading and the class presentation about this topic, please answer the following question:
Analyze the potential implications of the Co-determination principles over the organization’s decision making process from the perspectives of the managers and the employees.
From the managers perspective, the first implication clearly has to do with the decision making itself, because once workers and unions take a place in the decision making of companies, it will be more tricky to reach a final agreement. We have to add the fact that unions are mostly composed by people who do not have a strict education which will probably entail several misunderstandings when discussing key points in negotiations. They might assume a stubborn behavior without considering the real knowledge about certain topics such as finance, accounting and so on. Ignorance about these topics can cause unions to ask for unachievable benefits and conditions which, in the case of being taken into account, might origin troubles within the company.
Finally, from employees’ perspective, we might say that given their important role inside the organizations their opinions and considerations are heard sooner or later, so it means a great chance to motivate good ideas and promote a real change inside the company. Why do they have the potential to carry out these ideas? Basically, because they are the first ones who perceive the real environment inside the organizations, they know the inner company as probably seniors managers don’t and have a complete knowledge about every process. Even, if they disagree with the union, they are not forced to resign or change their mind, they are free to decide either they strike or keep working
Source: Piette, Jean-Jacques. 2004. “Understanding Management German style”. Les Amis de L’ecole de Paris.